Case 1403222/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Webb v Philip Herbert — 2019
- Case reference
- 1403222/2019
- Decision date
- 1 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harper MBE
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Webb
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr P Webb’s claim succeeded on each of the heads recorded in the judgment. It held that the respondent, Philip Herbert, had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £270.00 gross. It also found that Mr Webb had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, awarding £4,056.00 gross in damages.
The tribunal further ordered payment of £2,704.00 gross in respect of wages. On the redundancy issue, it found that Mr Webb was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £9,633.00 gross.
The judgment is brief and does not set out detailed reasons beyond these findings and awards. The total of the sums ordered is £16,663.00 gross.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £270.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £270 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £4,056.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £4,056 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of £2,704.00 gross in respect of wages. | Upheld | — | £2,704 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £9,633.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £9,633 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,663
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.