Case 1403243/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Ceilidh Miller v AND Cornish Pub Company Limited and 2 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403243/2022
- Decision date
- 21 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Miss Ceilidh Miller
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under rule 21 after no valid response was presented. It recorded that the claimant's former employer was the second respondent, Stargazy Inns Limited, so the first respondent was dismissed from the proceedings. The claimant's claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded against the second respondent. The tribunal found that she was owed £1,738.00 for wages in June and July 2022, that she had received £1,257.38, and that the unpaid balance was £481.38 gross.
The claimant's claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay also succeeded against the second respondent. The tribunal ordered payment of £508.75 gross for that claim. The second respondent was therefore ordered to pay the claimant £990.13 in total.
The tribunal also found that the third respondent, Mr Paul Sutcliffe, was an employee and agent of the second respondent and that the claimant was discriminated against by him on the grounds of her sex. For that claim the tribunal awarded £3,000.00 for injury to feelings, together with interest at 8% per annum calculated at 68p per day for 380 days, which produced an additional £258.40. The third respondent was therefore ordered to pay £3,258.40 in total. Taken together, the orders in the judgment total £4,248.53.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal said the claimant was owed wages of £1,738.00 for June and July 2022 but had only received £1,257.38. | Upheld | — | £481 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded accrued but unpaid holiday pay against the second respondent. | Upheld | — | £509 |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal found the claimant was discriminated against by the third respondent on grounds of sex. The award comprised £3,000 for injury to feelings plus £258.40 interest. | Upheld | Sex | £3,258 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,249
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.