Case 1403244/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jordan Rurak v AND Cornish Pub Company Limited and 2 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403244/2022
- Decision date
- 21 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr Jordan Rurak
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remedy judgment under Rule 21 after no valid response had been presented. The tribunal noted that the claimant’s former employer was the second respondent, and that the first and third respondents were therefore dismissed from the proceedings. The judgment was sent to the parties on 21 July 2023, following the hearing on 7 July 2023.
The claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded against the second respondent. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was owed wages of £1,441.00 for July 2022, but had only received £1,103.19. The gross sum awarded for that claim was £337.81.
The claimant’s claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay also succeeded against the second respondent. The tribunal ordered the second respondent to pay £487.85 gross in respect of that claim. No separate award for interest, injury to feelings, or any other compensatory head was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Succeeded against the second respondent only. The judgment records that the claimant was owed wages of £1,441.00 for July 2022 but received £1,103.19. | Upheld | — | £338 |
| Holiday pay | Succeeded against the second respondent only as accrued but unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £488 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £826
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.