Case 1403252/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H. Crook, wife v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403252/2022
- Decision date
- 7 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mrs H. Crook, wife
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Exeter on 12 October 2023 before Employment Judge Smail. The claimant was Mr J. Crook and the respondent was South Western Ambulance Service NHS Trust. The judgment records that full oral reasons were given at the hearing.
The only substantive outcome recorded in the written judgment is that the dismissal was not unfair. On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. No separate remedy, liability split, or monetary award is recorded in the judgment text provided.
The judgment also states that any party requiring written reasons had to email the tribunal within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties. The written extract does not set out the factual findings or legal reasoning in detail beyond the conclusion on unfair dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states: 'The dismissal was not unfair.' Full oral reasons were given at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.