Case 1403254/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Helena Ifeka, counsel, instructed by Keystone Law For the v Mr David Laskow-Pooley (a director of the Respondent company) Page 2 of 20 — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403254/2022
- Decision date
- 19 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr D.
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Helena Ifeka, counsel, instructed by Keystone Law For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant moved from an informal business relationship with the respondent into a consultancy agreement in January 2018 and then into a written contract of employment with effect from 1 April 2020. It accepted that the claimant's salary increased when the first LRE system sale occurred in June 2020, and found that the increased pay was not paid. The tribunal also found that salary stopped altogether from August 2021 onwards. The respondent's case that there was an overarching business partnership under which payment could be deferred until the company could afford to pay was rejected. The tribunal held that the employment contract was binding, had been reviewed by the respondent, and was not subordinated to any informal arrangement.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal was by reason of redundancy but procedurally unfair because there had been no adequate consultation, no consideration of alternatives, and no right of appeal was communicated. | Upheld | — | £14,213 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal rejected the respondent's case that an informal business partnership deferred payment of salary and held the written employment contract governed the parties' relationship. | Upheld | — | £74,800 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £89,013
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,713
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £12,500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.139 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Scope v Thornett [2006] EWCA Civ 1600
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.