Case 1403270/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Andrew Driver v Mr Simon Moore and Ms Becky Moore — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403270/2023
- Decision date
- 7 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Andrew Driver
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Andrew Driver’s claims were heard at Bristol by video on 21 August 2023 before Employment Judge C H O’Rourke. The Respondents, Mr Simon Moore and Ms Becky Moore, did not attend or take part in the hearing. Oral reasons were given at the hearing, and the written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal found that the Respondents failed to pay arrears of holiday pay and ordered them to pay Mr Driver £718.30. It also found that the Respondents failed to provide terms and conditions of employment compliant with s.1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. In relation to that failure, and subject to s.38 of the Employment Act 2002, the tribunal ordered payment of four weeks’ pay based on an average weekly salary of £250, producing an award of £1,000.
The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £1,718.30, made up of the holiday pay arrears and the separate statutory award for failure to provide compliant written terms.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment of arrears of holiday pay in the sum of £718.30. | Upheld | — | £718 |
| Other | The tribunal found the Respondents had not provided terms and conditions of employment compliant with s.1 ERA 1996 and, subject to s.38 Employment Act 2002, ordered payment of four weeks' pay calculated at an average weekly salary of £250. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,718
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.1 ERA 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.