Case 1403286/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O’Sullivan, in person For the First v Temp Healthcare Solutions Ltd and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403286/2019
- Decision date
- 9 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Appearances
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr O’Sullivan, in person For the First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing heard by telephone on 9 April 2020, Employment Judge Midgley considered Mr O’Sullivan’s claim against Temp Healthcare Solutions Ltd and Crazy Candy 2019 Ltd. The First Respondent did not attend and the Second Respondent did not attend.
The tribunal dismissed the Claimant’s unlawful deduction of wages claim against the First Respondent. The stated reason was that the claim form disclosed no claim against the First Respondent, so there was no viable claim to proceed with on that basis.
The written record states that reasons were contained in the Case Management Summary dated 9 April 2020. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Preliminary hearing; the tribunal dismissed the unlawful deduction of wages claim against the First Respondent because the claim form disclosed no claim against that respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.