Case 1403286/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Alison Mcrobbie v Department of Work and Pensions — 2024
- Case reference
- 1403286/2022
- Decision date
- 10 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Oldroyd Appearances
- Venue
- In private
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Alison Mcrobbie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe order records a private CVP hearing before Employment Judge Oldroyd on 13 and 14 May 2024. The claimant's application dated 8 May 2024 to reconsider the deposit order was dismissed, and her application dated 15 August 2023 to amend the claim to bring Category 2 claims was also dismissed.
The tribunal granted the claimant's separate application dated 15 August 2023 to amend the claim to bring Category 3 and 4 allegations as victimisation, direct disability discrimination and a failure to make reasonable adjustments, but only in part. The order states that the allegations at paragraphs 73.2.6, 73.2.8 and 73.2.9 of the earlier order were to proceed as allegations of victimisation and direct disability discrimination only. The claimant's application dated 22 November 2023 to strike out the respondent's claim was dismissed. The extract contains no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Application dated 8 May 2024 to reconsider the deposit order said in the extract to have been made by EJ Midgley on 11 December 2024; the date appears inconsistent with the hearing dates in the extract. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Application dated 15 August 2023 to amend the claim to bring Category 2 claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Application dated 15 August 2023 to amend the claim to bring Category 3 and 4 claims as victimisation, direct disability discrimination and a failure to make reasonable adjustments was granted in part, save that the allegations at paragraphs 73.2.6, 73.2.8 and 73.2.9 of the earlier order were to proceed as allegations of victimisation and direct disability discrimination only. | Other | — | — |
| Other | Application dated 22 November 2023 to strike out the respondent's claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.