Case 1403313/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Mehari v Timothy Frank ( Frank Care Solutions Ltd) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403313/2022
- Decision date
- 20 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Volkmer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Mehari
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim after the claimant failed to comply with the tribunal's orders dated 18 May 2023 and 24 May 2023. By email dated 18 May 2023, the tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, as to why strikeout should not follow on that basis.
The reasons record that the claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The judgment is limited to strikeout and contains no merits findings or remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim was struck out and does not give a separate merits analysis for this head. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim was struck out and does not give a separate merits analysis for this head. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Mapped from the case listing's written-statements category; the judgment itself does not identify this head separately and only records that the claim was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.