Case 1403324/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. P. Tomlinson v Future Advanced Manufacture Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1403324/2018
- Decision date
- 22 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R. Harper MBE
- Venue
- Bristol
- Panel members
- Ms. Y. Ramsaran, Ms. P. Ray
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. P. Tomlinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Bristol on 22 and 23 July 2019 before Employment Judge R. Harper MBE, with Ms. Y. Ramsaran and Ms. P. Ray sitting as members. The claimant was Mr. P. Tomlinson and the respondent was Future Advanced Manufacture Limited.
The written judgment records that the claim of unfair dismissal was dismissed, the claim of disability discrimination was dismissed, and the claim of breach of contract was dismissed. The decision also states that oral reasons were given at the hearing.
No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment, and no separate remedy findings are set out in the extracted text. The record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.