Case 1403326/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Brock v Fiesta Flowers and Gifts Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1403326/2019
- Decision date
- 30 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Brock
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mrs H Brock against Fiesta Flowers & Gifts Ltd. The tribunal recorded that the claimant’s claim for an unauthorised deduction from wages was well founded and ordered the respondent to pay £131.61 gross.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the claim for an unauthorised deduction from wages well founded and ordered payment of the gross sum of £131.61. | Upheld | — | £132 |
| Breach of contract | Tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract and ordered damages in the gross sum of £1,724 in respect of notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,724 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,724 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,724 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the claim for accrued but untaken annual leave well founded and ordered payment of £59.93 gross. | Upheld | — | £60 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,640
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.