Case 1403335/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Winter v Springfield Catering Management Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403335/2023
- Decision date
- 18 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Winter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Ferguson Date decided that a determination could properly be made on the claim, or part of it, on that basis.
The tribunal found that Mrs M Winter was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £921.37. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £682.50 for that element.
The judgment records a total sum payable of £1,603.87. No further findings, statutory tests, or separate remedy components are set out in the short judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £921.37. | Upheld | — | £921 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and must pay £682.50. | Upheld | — | £683 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,604
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.