Case 1403341/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Westney-Bedward v Admiralty Hotel and Restaurant Limited and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 1403341/2023
- Decision date
- 4 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr D Westney-Bedward
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunal on 6 May 2023. The respondents did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge proceeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and determined the claim on the material available.
On the merits, the tribunal found that the respondents had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £658.00 gross. It also found that the respondents had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £504.00.
The tribunal stated that no further award was made in respect of the claim for “hassle, pain and suffering” because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to make such an award. The total sum awarded was £1,162.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondents had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £658.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £658 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondents had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £504.00. | Upheld | — | £504 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,162
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.