Case 1403350/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Hancox v SK Heating and Cooling Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403350/2022
- Decision date
- 4 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Date
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Hancox
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a hearing on the claimant’s application for interim relief under s.128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant was Mr T Hancox and the respondent was SK Heating and Cooling Limited. The hearing took place at Bristol on 4 November 2022 before Employment Judge C H O’Rourke. Mr Hancox appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr P Bradley, HR consultant.
The tribunal dealt only with the application for interim relief, which was brought pending determination of the claimant’s complaint of automatic unfair dismissal. The judgment records that the application was dismissed.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No further findings or remedy were recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Application for interim relief under s.128 Employment Rights Act 1996, pending determination of a complaint of automatic unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.128 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.