Case 1403365/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mrs C Wilson (T/a Stepping Stones Nursery and Woodland Adventures) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403365/2022
- Decision date
- 13 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote CVP hearing on 25 August 2023 before Employment Judge N J Roper, the tribunal found that Ms Lindy Minshull had been employed by Mrs Claire Wilson, trading as Stepping Stones Nursery and Woodland Adventures, from 13 June 2022 to 18 July 2022 as Office Manager (Finance). Ms Minshull had brought monetary claims for unlawful deduction from wages in respect of her final salary and unpaid accrued holiday pay. By the hearing, the outstanding £802.16 had been paid, so the tribunal made a declaration that the unlawful deduction claim was well-founded but did not make any further award on that claim.
The tribunal also considered the respondent's failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment. The respondent accepted that no written statement had been issued, but said the claimant could have arranged the paperwork herself; the claimant disputed that she had access or authority to do so. The tribunal applied section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 and noted that the minimum award was two weeks' pay unless exceptional circumstances made that unjust or inequitable.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been employed only for a short period and was not persuaded that it was just and equitable to award four weeks' pay. It also found no exceptional circumstances to disapply the statutory award. The tribunal therefore awarded the minimum two weeks' pay, limited to the statutory weekly cap of £571, producing a further award of £1,142. The claimant had sought £2,476.80, calculated by reference to four weeks' pay at £619.20 per week, but the tribunal did not increase the award beyond the statutory minimum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim concerned final salary and accrued holiday pay. The tribunal recorded that the outstanding sum of £802.16 had already been paid, so it made a declaration only and no further award on this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Failure to issue a written statement of particulars of employment. The tribunal found no exceptional circumstances and awarded two weeks' pay capped at £571 per week under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £1,142 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,142
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 24(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
- sections 38(2), (4) and (5) Employment Act 2002
- section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.