Case 1403366/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Davies v 1.Vision Petlon Polymers Limited (In Administration) 2.Polyram UK Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403366/2019
- Decision date
- 7 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Davies
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 24 November 2020, the Tribunal asked the Claimant to confirm whether she had received an update from the Administrator. In an email dated 8 December 2020, the Claimant confirmed that she had no objection to the claims against the First Respondent being struck out.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim against Vision Petlon Polymers Limited (In Administration). The reasons state that the First Respondent was dismissed from the proceedings. No substantive issues were determined as to liability or remedy in relation to that respondent.
The judgment expressly records that the claims against the Second Respondent, Polyram UK Ltd, remained active. Those claims were not adjudicated in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment only disposes of the claim against the First Respondent by striking it out after the Claimant confirmed she had no objection. The claims against the Second Respondent remained active and were not determined in this judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.