Case 1403366/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Jennings v Galos Plymouth Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403366/2022
- Decision date
- 30 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Appearances
- Venue
- Plymouth
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Jennings
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M Jennings brought claims against Galos Plymouth Limited, which did not enter a response and did not appear at the hearing in Plymouth on 17 February 2023. Employment Judge Self determined the matter on the papers before the tribunal.
The tribunal found that the claimant’s claim for accrued holiday pay on termination was well founded and awarded him £1,410.75 in respect of that claim. It also found that the claim for wrongful dismissal was well founded and awarded £313.50.
In addition, because the claimant had not been provided with a written statement of particulars of employment, the tribunal awarded two weeks' pay of £627 pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. The total sum awarded was £2,351.25.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued holiday pay upon termination was found well founded. | Upheld | — | £1,411 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Claim for wrongful dismissal was found well founded. | Upheld | — | £314 |
| Other | Award of two weeks' pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 because the claimant was not provided with a written statement of particulars of employment. | Upheld | — | £627 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,351
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 38 of the Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.