Case 1403383/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Mckechan v Wellies of Wellswood Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403383/2019
- Decision date
- 8 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Matthews Representation
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Mckechan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remedy judgment in Mr S Mckechan’s unfair dismissal claim against Wellies of Wellswood Limited. The tribunal made no order for reinstatement or re-engagement and ordered the respondent to pay unfair dismissal compensation totalling £7,677.46.
The basic award was calculated on the basis of gross weekly pay of £576.92, capped at £525, and two complete years’ service. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was aged 41 or over for one year of that service and under 41 for the other, producing a basic award of £1,312.50.
The compensatory award was calculated from net weekly pay of £446.31 for 14 weeks, less earnings in that period of £3,086.37, plus £250 for loss of statutory rights. The tribunal then applied a 25% increase for failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015 and added four weeks’ pay, at the capped weekly rate of £525, under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 because the respondent had failed to provide particulars of employment under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 before the proceedings began. The tribunal noted that the recoupment regulations did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Remedy judgment only. The tribunal awarded unfair dismissal compensation totalling £7,677.46, made up of a basic award of £1,312.50 and a compensatory award of £6,364.96. The compensatory award included a 25% uplift for failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015 and an additional award under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide particulars of employment. No order for reinstatement or re-engagement was made, and the recoupment regulations did not apply. | Upheld | — | £7,677 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,677
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,313
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £6,365
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015
- section 38 of the Employment Act 2002
- section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.