Case 1403388/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Brumers Bikes Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403388/2023
- Decision date
- 24 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bradford Appearances
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a video hearing in Bristol on 3 November 2023 before Employment Judge Bradford, the tribunal considered the respondent's applications to strike out the claim and for a deposit order, together with the claimant's application to rely on further and better particulars of claim filed on 27 October 2023. The claimant was represented by Mr Murdin, counsel, and the respondent by Mr Maini-Thompson, counsel.
The tribunal dismissed both of the respondent's applications. It also granted the claimant's application to rely on the further and better particulars of claim, recording that the respondent agreed to that application. The judgment was procedural only and did not determine the substantive merits of the underlying claim or record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Respondent's application to strike out the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Respondent's application for a deposit order. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claimant's application to rely on the further and better particulars of claim filed on 27 October 2023. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.