Case 1403391/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Allen (Claimant’s partner) For the v Mr R. Cater (Consultant) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403391/2018
- Decision date
- 3 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Allen (Claimant’s partner) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Southampton on 3 January 2020, Employment Judge Gray held that Mr B Stifani succeeded in his claims against Smartpaint Limited for unlawful deduction from wages and holiday pay. The judgment was given orally at the hearing, and the written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,010.56. The extracted judgment does not break that figure down between the unlawful deduction from wages and holiday pay heads of claim, so it is recorded here as a single gross award covering both claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal succeeded the claimant on this head together with holiday pay and ordered a single gross sum; the judgment does not split the amount between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal succeeded the claimant on this head together with unlawful deduction from wages and ordered a single gross sum; the judgment does not split the amount between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,011
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.