Case 1403391/2019 · Employment Tribunal
- IN PERSON (ASSISTED BY MS S FITZGERALD (ELIPS)) FOR THE v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403391/2019
- Decision date
- 17 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
1 namedClaimant
- IN PERSON (ASSISTED BY MS S FITZGERALD (ELIPS)) FOR THE
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant was at all material times a disabled person within the meaning of s6 Equality Act 2010 by reason of dyslexia. That finding is recorded in the judgment as a standalone conclusion and was not linked to any monetary award.
The only substantive claim recorded in the judgment was indirect disability discrimination under s19 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal stated that this claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. No further reasoning, liability findings, or remedy assessment is set out in the extracted text.
The judgment records no award or other financial remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim of indirect disability discrimination under s19 Equality Act 2010 was 'dismissed upon withdrawal'. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s6 Equality Act 2010
- s19 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.