Case 1403398/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Carolyn Davis v Folio Print Finishing limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403398/2020
- Decision date
- 5 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Carolyn Davis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mrs Carolyn Davis’s position was redundant in May 2020 and that no offer of suitable alternative employment was made. On that basis, it recorded that she was constructively dismissed by reason of redundancy.
The tribunal held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £12,717.69. It also found that she was wrongfully dismissed and awarded pay in lieu of notice of £4,663.12.
The written record states that the total sum payable by Folio Print Finishing Limited was £17,381.81. Reasons had been given orally at the hearing, and the written record does not set out any further legal analysis beyond those conclusions.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal stated that the claimant was constructively dismissed by reason of redundancy. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant entitled to a redundancy payment of £12,717.69. | Upheld | — | £12,718 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was wrongfully dismissed and awarded pay in lieu of notice of £4,663.12. | Upheld | — | £4,663 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,382
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.