Case 1403400/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Sadowski v Mr B Biggs t/a BRB Logistics — 2019
- Case reference
- 1403400/2019
- Decision date
- 19 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Sadowski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, the tribunal found that the Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages. It ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant the gross sum of £2,676 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the Claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and debts in relation to tax liability. It awarded damages of £1,040 for notice and £2,368 for the tax liability debts, making a total award of £3,408 on the breach of contract claim.
The judgment records the orders only and does not set out further reasoning beyond the findings and sums awarded. The judgment was sent to the parties on 19 November 2019.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,676 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £2,676 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment found the Respondent was in breach of contract in respect of notice and debts in relation to tax liability, awarding £1,040 and £2,368 respectively, a total of £3,408. | Upheld | — | £3,408 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,084
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.