Case 1403412/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Farinha v Business Class Financials Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403412/2022
- Decision date
- 23 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Farinha
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 27 October 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge proceeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 18 August 2023 was cancelled.
On the papers, the tribunal found that Miss A Farinha had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £1,916.67. It also found that she had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £884.60.
The tribunal further found that the claimant had suffered an unlawful deduction from her wages and ordered payment of £1,000.00 under sections 23 and 24(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £3,801.27.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,916.67. | Upheld | — | £1,917 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £884.60. | Upheld | — | £885 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,000.00 under sections 23 and 24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,801
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- sections 23 and 24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.