Case 1403420/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Blake v Marchwood Engineering Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403420/2020
- Decision date
- 8 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Date
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Blake
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bristol on 30 June 2021 before Employment Judge C H O’Rourke. The claimant, Mr D Blake, was not in attendance or represented, and the respondent, Marchwood Engineering Limited, was also not in attendance or represented.
Subject to Rule 47 of the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure 2013, the tribunal recorded that the claimant’s claims of discrimination on grounds of age, failure to provide pay in lieu of notice, arrears of holiday pay, and unlawful deductions from wages failed and were dismissed. No liability findings or remedy awards were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Claim failed because the claimant did not attend the hearing and the tribunal dismissed it under Rule 47. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim described as failure to provide pay in lieu of notice; dismissed because the claimant did not attend. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for arrears of holiday pay; dismissed because the claimant did not attend. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unlawful deductions from wages; dismissed because the claimant did not attend. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.