Case 1403427/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Pasquwelage v The Chief Constable of Wiltshire Police — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403427/2020
- Decision date
- 26 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cuthbert Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Pasquwelage
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Pasquwelage presented her ET1 on 8 July 2020 alleging race and disability discrimination against the Chief Constable of Wiltshire Police. The case then went through several case management hearings and multiple iterations of particulars, with the tribunal repeatedly directing her to clarify the factual allegations and the legal claims. The judgment records that she later sought to add further claims, including sex harassment, indirect discrimination, constructive unfair dismissal, age discrimination and whistleblowing, but the case remained inadequately particularised.
On 4 November 2022 EJ Midgley made an unless order requiring a completed schedule and warned that, if it was not complied with, the amendment application would be dismissed and the case limited to claims identifiable from the ET1 and attached grievance. The claimant did not comply. At the final hearing on 16 January 2023, the tribunal attempted to contact her, adjourned for an hour to give her one final opportunity to join, and received no response.
Employment Judge Cuthbert then dismissed the claim under Rule 47. The reasons given were the length of time the proceedings had been underway, the claimant's previous non-compliance with orders, the earlier finding of unreasonable conduct and costs order, her failure to comply with the unless order, her failure to engage with the respondent before the hearing, and her failure to attend without explanation. No substantive merits findings or monetary award were made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Dismissed under Rule 47 for non-attendance; the judgment makes no substantive merits findings. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed under Rule 47 for non-attendance; the judgment makes no substantive merits findings. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47
- Rule 2 overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.