Case 1403437/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Neampan (second claimant) For the v Mr N Talukdar (Director) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403437/2019
- Decision date
- 4 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emerton Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Neampan (second claimant) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Emerton, sitting alone in Southampton on 3-4 February 2020, found that both Mrs J Maikhami and Mr P Neampan were employees of Ropley Thai Lounge Limited and that both unfair dismissal claims were well founded. The tribunal also found that the respondent failed to provide written particulars of employment to either claimant, as required by section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
On remedy, Mrs Maikhami was awarded a basic award of £844.12 and a compensatory award of £580.80, comprising £400 for loss of statutory rights, £106.80 for pension losses and £74 for accommodation expenses. The tribunal then increased her award by £844.12 under section 38(3) of the Employment Act 2002.
Mr Neampan was awarded a basic award of £1,575.00 and a compensatory award of £652.25, comprising £400 for loss of statutory rights, £186.24 for pension losses and £66.01 for vehicle rental. His award was then increased by £1,050.00 under section 38(3) of the Employment Act 2002. The aggregate monetary award across both claimants was £5,546.29.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | First claimant Mrs J Maikhami. The tribunal awarded a basic award of £844.12 and a compensatory award of £580.80 made up of £400 loss of statutory rights, £106.80 pension losses and £74 accommodation expenses, then increased the award by £844.12 under section 38(3) of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £2,269 |
| Unfair dismissal | Second claimant Mr P Neampan. The tribunal awarded a basic award of £1,575.00 and a compensatory award of £652.25 made up of £400 loss of statutory rights, £186.24 pension losses and £66.01 vehicle rental, then increased the award by £1,050.00 under section 38(3) of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £3,277 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,546
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,419
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,233
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38(3) Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.