Case 1403454/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J. Dunkley, Solicitor v Churston Court Inn Ltd and others — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403454/2022
- Decision date
- 22 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J. Dunkley, Solicitor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claims after the respondents failed to present valid responses and did not attend. It extended time just and equitably for claim 1401037/2023 and proceeded under rules 21 and 47.
It upheld wrongful dismissal and awarded one week's notice pay of £350. It also upheld the separate claim for failure to provide a statement of terms under s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996, awarding four weeks' gross pay of £1,400 under s.38 Employment Act 2002.
On the pregnancy claim, the tribunal accepted evidence that after the claimant told the second respondent she was pregnant she was ignored compared with other employees, was not helped with lifting tasks, was told she was 'not that pregnant', was accused of 'taking the piss' about sickness absences, was called 'hormonal', had her hours varied after complaining, was told she was 'getting fat' in front of staff and customers, and received the 2 August 2022 text 'you're causing issues don't bother coming in'. It upheld the pregnancy discrimination claim under s.18(2) Equality Act 2010 and awarded £20,000 for injury to feelings, a 25% ACAS uplift of £5,000, and interest of £3,046.58, making £28,046.20 against the first respondent; the judgment also records contingent s.110 Equality Act 2010 awards of £5,000 plus interest against the second respondent and £15,000 plus interest against the third if the first respondent cannot or will not pay.
It separately upheld automatic unfair dismissal for pregnancy-related reasons under s.99 Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal recorded a basic award of £0.00 because the claimant had less than one year's service, and a compensatory award of £0.00 because she suffered no direct losses. The total payable by the first respondent was £29,796.20 within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal held that the first respondent wrongfully dismissed the claimant and awarded one week's notice pay of £350. | Upheld | — | £350 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a failure to provide a statement of terms under s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996 and awarded four weeks' gross pay of £1,400 under s.38 Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £1,400 |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The tribunal upheld the pregnancy discrimination claim under s.18(2) Equality Act 2010. It accepted the pleaded incidents, including being ignored after disclosure of pregnancy, lack of lifting assistance, comments that she was 'not that pregnant', 'taking the piss', 'hormonal' and 'getting fat', altered hours after complaints, and the text 'you're causing issues don't bother coming in'. It awarded £20,000 for injury to feelings, a 25% ACAS uplift of £5,000, and interest of £3,046.58, making £28,046.20 against the first respondent. The judgment also records contingent s.110 Equality Act 2010 awards of £5,000 plus interest against the second respondent and £15,000 plus interest against the third respondent if the first respondent cannot or will not pay. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £28,046 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal upheld automatic unfair dismissal for pregnancy-related reasons contrary to s.99 Employment Rights Act 1996. It recorded a basic award of £0.00 because the claimant had less than one year's service, and a compensatory award of £0.00 because she suffered no direct losses. | Upheld | — | £0 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £29,796
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £0
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
8 references- just and equitable extension of time
- rules 21 and 47
- s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
- s.18(2) Equality Act 2010
- s.99 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.110 Equality Act 2010
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.