Case 1403469/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Vagany v Mozzington Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403469/2022
- Decision date
- 21 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Vagany
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued judgment under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. On that basis, the Employment Judge determined the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21.
The judgment records that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £13,124.99 gross.
The judgment also states that the respondent must pay the claimant £13,124.99 in total. No separate breakdown of remedy components is given in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and orders payment of £13,124.99 gross. The extracted text does not record any other substantive claim outcome. | Upheld | — | £13,125 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,125
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.