Case 1403481/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Trapp v Reverend P Ashman and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403481/2020
- Decision date
- 6 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Richardson Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr A Trapp
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal first held that Reverend Ashman, the First Respondent, was not the Claimant's employer and removed him from the proceedings. It found that the relevant contracting party was the Parochial Parish Council, and that the Claimant had long understood himself to be self-employed in the role of Director of Music at St John the Baptist Church Weston Super Mare.
Applying the status authorities it cited, including Ready Mixed Concrete, Hall (Inspector of Taxes) v Lorimer, Express and Echo Publications Ltd v Tanton and Quashie v Stringfellow Restaurants Ltd, the Tribunal concluded that the overall picture pointed to self-employment rather than a contract of service. It accepted that the Claimant provided significant skill and worked under some practical constraints, but found there was little control by the Rector over how he performed the role, and that he retained a real ability to arrange substitutes for absences.
The Tribunal placed weight on the parties' long-running conduct from 2008 onwards. The Claimant submitted tax returns as self-employed, claimed expenses, and continued to arrange and pay substitute organists for many absences, including for an extended period after his 2018 road traffic accident, while the Church continued to pay him the agreed monthly sum. Although some features pointed towards employment, such as monthly instalments and the Church paying substitutes for a limited number of services each year, the Tribunal found those factors did not outweigh the parties' conduct and the Claimant's own treatment of the relationship as self-employed.
On that basis, the Tribunal held the Claimant was not an employee within section 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It therefore had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim, which was dismissed. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction because the Claimant was at all relevant times self-employed and not an employee under s.230 Employment Rights Act 1996. The First Respondent was also removed as a respondent because he was not the Claimant's employer. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.230 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Ready Mixed Concrete
- Hall (Inspector of Taxes) v Lorimer
- Express and Echo Publications Ltd v Tanton
- Quashie v Stringfellow Restaurants Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.