Case 1403490/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Soper v AND Bestway (Holdings) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1403490/2019
- Decision date
- 11 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Soper
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was dealt with in chambers under Rule 21 after the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. Employment Judge N J Roper recorded the judgment on 29 November 2019.
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because she had insufficient service to bring that claim. The judgment does not set out any further findings on unfair dismissal beyond that jurisdictional point.
The claimant's breach of contract claim succeeded in respect of one week's notice pay. The claimant's claims for unlawful deduction from wages and accrued but unpaid holiday pay also succeeded.
The judgment did not determine the amount of the remedy. It stated that the appropriate remedy would be decided at a later hearing, notice of which would be sent to the parties in due course.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant had insufficient service to bring the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Succeeded in respect of one week's notice pay. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Succeeded; no amount was specified in this judgment because remedy was left to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Succeeded for accrued but unpaid holiday pay; no amount was specified in this judgment because remedy was left to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.