Case 1403491/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Haagensen v Heartbreakers (SO15) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403491/2023
- Decision date
- 10 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cuthbert Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Haagensen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found Miss R Haagensen's holiday pay claim well-founded. It held that Heartbreakers (SO15) Ltd had failed to pay the full sum in lieu of untaken holiday to which she was entitled on termination of employment.
In the appendix, the tribunal recorded that the claimant was employed from 1 April 2022 to 1 January 2023, that her pay period included irregular hours and later salary-based earnings, and that her week's pay was £284.43. Applying Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, it calculated holiday entitlement on termination at 3.219 weeks and the payment in lieu due at £915.58.
The tribunal then deducted £678.48 already paid by the respondent and ordered the balance of £237.09 to be paid to the claimant, less any applicable statutory deductions.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant's holiday pay claim well-founded and ordered payment of the balance due on termination. The appendix recorded the calculation under Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £237 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £237
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Regulation 14, Working Time Regulations 1998
- Employment Rights Act 1996, Chapter II
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.