Case 1403492/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ben McCabe v AND Beau’s Ice Cream Parlour Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403492/2022
- Decision date
- 9 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ben McCabe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was decided in chambers at Plymouth on 30 December 2022 under Rule 21 because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. The tribunal recorded that Mr Ben McCabe's claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded against Beau's Ice Cream Parlour Limited.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £10,150.77. The judgment identified the components of that sum as unpaid salary for December 2021 of £120.00, July 2022 of £163.95, August 2022 of £2,327.51, and September 2022 of £2,327.51, together with unpaid pension contributions of £2,712.20 and an unpaid invoice of £2,500.00.
The judgment also records that the hearing listed for 18 August 2023 was cancelled. No discrimination, dismissal, or other claims were determined in the extracted text, and no additional remedy heads were set out beyond the gross sum awarded for the unlawful deduction from wages claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment entered under Rule 21 because the response time had expired and no valid response had been presented. The award was for the gross sum of £10,150.77, comprising unpaid salary for December 2021 (£120.00), July 2022 (£163.95), August 2022 (£2,327.51), September 2022 (£2,327.51), unpaid pension contributions (£2,712.20), and an unpaid invoice (£2,500.00). | Upheld | — | £10,151 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,151
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.