Case 1403502/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Lamb v Crown Heights Medical Centre — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403502/2020
- Decision date
- 17 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Representation
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Lamb
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing at Southampton on 9-10 August 2021, Employment Judge Reed heard the claimant, Mrs J Lamb, in person and the respondent represented by Miss J Linford, counsel. The tribunal gave its reasons orally at the hearing and recorded them in the written judgment dated 10 August 2021 and sent to the parties on 17 August 2021.
The unanimous judgment was that Mrs Lamb was not dismissed. On that basis, her claim of unfair dismissal failed. The tribunal also found that she was not unlawfully discriminated against on the ground of sex, so the sex discrimination claim was dismissed as well.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was not dismissed, so the unfair dismissal claim failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal found that the claimant was not unlawfully discriminated against on the ground of sex. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.