Case 1403507/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Boland v University of Winchester — 2024
- Case reference
- 1403507/2022
- Decision date
- 20 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self
- Panel members
- Mr N Thornback, Mr M Richardson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Boland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a remedy judgment in the case of Ms A Boland v University of Winchester, heard at Southampton by CVP on 4 July 2024 before Employment Judge Self sitting with Mr N Thornback and Mr M Richardson. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The judgment states that unfair dismissal had already been found well founded. In consequence, the claimant was awarded a basic award of £3,674.52 and a compensatory award of £500. The judgment does not set out the liability reasoning again, only the remedy flowing from that earlier finding.
The judgment also states that disability discrimination had already been found well founded. In consequence, the claimant was awarded £23,750 for injury to feelings and interest of £3,976.98. The judgment does not separate the discrimination award into further heads beyond those figures.
The total award payable under the judgment was £31,901.50.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The remedy judgment records a basic award of £3,674.52 and a compensatory award of £500 following the earlier finding that the unfair dismissal claim was well founded. | Upheld | — | £4,175 |
| Disability discrimination | The remedy judgment records an injury to feelings award of £23,750 and interest of £3,976.98 following the earlier finding that the disability discrimination claim was well founded. | Upheld | Disability | £27,727 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £31,902
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,675
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.