Case 1403521/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Blackman (in person) For the v Jordan Manufacturing Ltd (In Administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403521/2019
- Decision date
- 28 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Blackman (in person) For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard by Employment Judge Gray at Bristol by video on 21 December 2020. The Respondent, Jordan Manufacturing Limited (in Administration), did not attend. The Tribunal gave judgment orally at the hearing and the written record confirms that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The Tribunal held that the Claimant, Mr J Blackman, succeeded in his claim for breach of contract in respect of notice pay, unlawful deduction from wages, and accrued but untaken leave. The judgment records that the amounts remained unpaid and orders the Respondent to pay gross sums of £2,148.33 for notice, £560.34 for arrears of wages, and £84.03 for holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded as a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £2,148 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as arrears of wages. | Upheld | — | £560 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for accrued but untaken leave. | Upheld | — | £84 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,793
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.