Case 1403540/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Saunders v Nationwide Building Society — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403540/2019
- Decision date
- 11 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Saunders
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal had written to the claimant on 19 January 2021 giving her an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons identified were non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 10 December and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim is struck out for non-compliance with an order and because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not set out the substantive particulars of this claim; classification follows the supplied listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim is struck out for non-compliance with an order and because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not set out the substantive particulars of this claim; classification follows the supplied listing category. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.