Case 1403542/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Sarah Weston v AND Grafton Technology Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1403542/2018
- Decision date
- 30 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Sarah Weston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 30 August 2019 the tribunal sat in chambers and, under Rule 21, recorded that the respondent had indicated it did not dispute the claims then determined. It found that Miss Sarah Weston was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £641.55, calculated as 2.5 weeks at £256.62 gross per week.
The tribunal also held that the breach of contract claim succeeded and ordered the respondent to pay two days' pay in the net sum of £85.54. The judgment did not determine the remaining claims of unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction from wages, stating that those claims would proceed to a separately ordered hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £641.55, calculated as 2.5 weeks at £256.62 gross per week. The respondent had indicated it did not dispute the claim, and the judgment was entered under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £642 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the breach of contract claim succeeded and ordered the respondent to pay two days' pay in the net sum of £85.54. The respondent had indicated it did not dispute the claim, and the judgment was entered under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £86 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £727
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.