Case 1403559/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms C Hammond, Human Resources Officer — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403559/2019
- Decision date
- 10 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis reserved judgment dealt only with the preliminary issue of disability status in Mrs Jaroszczak’s claim against Southampton Apartment Hotels Ltd. She worked for the respondent from September 2018 to September 2019 as a Room Maker Manager. The tribunal heard her evidence, her emails to management, GP letters, fit notes and other medical records, and considered whether back pain, endometriosis and stress/anxiety/depression met the section 6 Equality Act 2010 definition.
On the mental impairment, the tribunal accepted that by 28 May 2019 Mrs Jaroszczak was suffering from stress and anxiety with symptoms of depression, but it found the evidence of substantial adverse effect was not enough at that date. It concluded that by 1 July 2019 the effects had become substantial, including sleep disturbance, tearfulness, panic attacks and later needing twice as long to do everyday tasks, and that the impairment was likely to last more than 12 months. It therefore held that she was disabled by reason of a mental impairment from 1 July 2019.
On the physical impairment, the tribunal found that Mrs Jaroszczak had back pain and endometriosis throughout her employment, but that the relevant substantial adverse effect first appeared on 6 May 2019. The decisive evidence was her account that she stopped learning to drive because she could not sit without pain, together with the tribunal’s acceptance that difficulty using transport because of pain can amount to a substantial adverse effect. It did not find that endometriosis caused any separate adverse effect beyond the back pain.
No liability findings or remedy were made on the underlying unfair dismissal, race discrimination or disability discrimination claims in this judgment. The outcome was confined to the disability-status issue, which the tribunal determined for the purposes of the case.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary disability-status issue only. The tribunal found the claimant was disabled by reason of a physical impairment (back pain) from 6 May 2019 and by reason of a mental impairment (stress/anxiety/depression) from 1 July 2019, but this judgment did not determine liability or remedy on the underlying discrimination claim. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- section 212(1) Equality Act 2010
- Aderemi v London and South Eastern Railway
- Guidance on the Definition of Disability
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.