Case 1403576/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr G Lomas (Consultant) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403576/2018
- Decision date
- 17 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emerton Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Southampton before Employment Judge Emerton, sitting alone, on 16-17 March 2020. The claimant, Ms V Wilson, appeared in person and the respondent, Sussex Removals and Storage Limited, was represented by Mr G Lomas.
The written judgment records a single claim: unfair dismissal. The tribunal held that the claim was not well founded and therefore dismissed it. No further findings of fact, legal reasoning, or analysis of the dismissal claim are set out in the short written record supplied.
No monetary award is recorded, and the judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing, with written reasons not to be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the claim of unfair dismissal was not well founded. No further reasons or monetary award were recorded in the written reasons provided. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.