Case 1403589/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Hillyer, Claimant’s mother (Claimant attending) For the v Miss S Kasote, General Manager (Mr Arrabbetou attending) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403589/2019
- Decision date
- 24 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Hillyer, Claimant’s mother (Claimant attending) For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant's claim for failure to pay in lieu of notice, pleaded as a breach of contract claim, was well founded. No separate factual findings or legal analysis were recorded in the written decision beyond the conclusion that the claim succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the agreed sum of £199.20 net. The decision records that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claim that the respondent failed to pay the claimant in lieu of notice, in breach of contract, was well founded and ordered payment of the agreed sum of £199.20 net. | Upheld | — | £199 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £199
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.