Case 1403590/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403590/2019
- Decision date
- 2 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Donna Jonas brought a monetary breach of contract claim against Openreach Limited arising from the calculation of her 2018/2019 bonus under the respondent's discretionary Reward Framework. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had worked as a Finance Analyst from 29 June 1981 until 30 June 2019, that her employment ended following a reorganisation, and that she accepted an Enhanced Voluntary Leavers Package worth in excess of £86,000. The dispute concerned the third-stage personal performance multiplier applied to her bonus: the claimant said it should have been 0.8, while the respondent applied 0.5, a difference agreed to be £1,800 gross.
The tribunal found that the bonus scheme was discretionary and that the respondent had a limited pot of money to distribute. It accepted the respondent's explanation that the lower multiplier was chosen because of the reorganisation, the need to reward and motivate employees who remained with Openreach on reduced salaries, and the fact that the claimant had already received a generous EVLP. The tribunal also noted that many employees who left in March 2019 were not eligible for the bonus, whereas the claimant remained employed until 30 June 2019 and was therefore eligible for consideration.
Applying the implied contractual term that discretion must not be exercised arbitrarily or capriciously, and asking whether the decision was one no reasonable employer might have made, the tribunal held that the decision to use a 0.5 multiplier was within the agreed parameters of the scheme and was neither arbitrary nor unreasonable. It also noted that the decision had been reviewed by a second line manager. The breach of contract claim was therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim concerned the calculation of a discretionary bonus under the BT/Openreach Reward Framework. The claimant said the third-stage personal performance multiplier should have been 0.8 rather than 0.5, a difference agreed to be £1,800 gross. The tribunal held the respondent was entitled to exercise its discretion as it did and that there was no breach of contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- IBM v Dalgleish [2017] IRLR 4 CA
- Clark v Nomura International [2000] IRLR 66
- implied term not to exercise discretion in an arbitrary or capricious manner
- whether no reasonable employer might have made the decision
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.