Case 1403593/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Glendinning, husband of the claimant. For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403593/2018
- Decision date
- 16 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson
- Venue
- Havant
- Panel members
- Mrs F Robertson, Ms A Sinclair
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Glendinning, husband of the claimant. For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Havant, the tribunal recorded by consent that the change in the claimant’s role in May 2018 amounted to a demotion. It dismissed the claimant’s direct discrimination claim under section 13 Equality Act 2010.
The claimant’s victimisation claim under section 27 Equality Act 2010 succeeded. The tribunal found that she was subjected to a detriment when she was required to move desks between 15 and 17 May 2018 and when she was named as a whistleblower on 30 July 2018.
The tribunal awarded £4,750 in respect of victimisation plus £616.33 interest. The written record does not split the £4,750 between heads of loss, and it states that all other claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment dismisses the claimant's direct discrimination claim under section 13 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | The tribunal found detriments when the claimant was required to move desks between 15 and 17 May 2018 and when she was named as a whistleblower on 30 July 2018. The award of £4,750 was not split between heads of loss in the written record. | Upheld | — | £4,750 |
| Other | The judgment states that all other claims are dismissed, but the written record does not identify those remaining claims by type. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,366
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £4,750
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- section 27 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.