Case 1403615/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Booker v Holman Fraser Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1403615/2023
- Decision date
- 14 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Booker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment, not a merits decision on the underlying employment claims. The tribunal recorded that by letter dated 8 August 2024 it gave Holman Fraser Limited an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, as to why its response should not be struck out because it had not complied with the tribunal orders dated 4 October 2023 and 8 February 2024 and had not been actively pursued.
The respondent did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Dawson struck out the response. The judgment also states that the respondent remains entitled to notice of hearings and decisions, but may only participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. No substantive liability finding or remedy was recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine any substantive claim on the merits; it strikes out the respondent's response after non-compliance with tribunal orders and failure to make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.