Case 1403637/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Parker v South Somerset District Council — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403637/2021
- Decision date
- 20 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Appearances
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Parker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Bristol on 22 and 23 November 2022, Employment Judge Livesey dealt with a preliminary evidential issue in Mrs C Parker's case against South Somerset District Council. The tribunal held that section 111A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 applied to a conversation on 1 June 2021 between the claimant and Mrs Keitch and/or that the conversation was without prejudice, with the result that allegations and evidence concerning it and its contents were inadmissible in these proceedings.
The written record states that the judgment was given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties on 20 December 2022. The extracted text does not set out any substantive liability finding or monetary award beyond that admissibility ruling.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment records a preliminary evidential ruling only: section 111A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was held to apply to a conversation on 1 June 2021 between the claimant and Mrs Keitch and/or the conversation was without prejudice, so allegations and evidence about it were inadmissible in these proceedings. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Section 111A ERA 1996
- without prejudice
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.