Case 1403644/2019 · Employment Tribunal
1) Mr A Joannou 2) Mr J Bundfuss-Perry v Wessex Garages (Holdings) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1403644/2019
- Decision date
- 5 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
1) Mr A Joannou 2) Mr J Bundfuss-Perry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThese proceedings concerned case numbers 1403644/2019 and 1403645/2019 against Wessex Garages (Holdings) Limited. The judgment is a short withdrawal judgment dated 5 December 2019 and records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimants.
No substantive findings of fact or law are set out in the text provided, and no remedy, liability finding, or split between the two case numbers is recorded. The judgment therefore reflects termination of the proceedings by withdrawal rather than an adjudication on the merits.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Case number 1403644/2019; the judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. No separate substantive determination or remedy is recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Case number 1403645/2019; the judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. No separate substantive determination or remedy is recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.