Case 1403647/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Miller v JN Landscapes Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403647/2019
- Decision date
- 13 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Miller
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 18 June 2021, the tribunal gave Mr Miller an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why his claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. The tribunal recorded that he had not complied with the order dated 11 February 2021 requiring further information.
Mr Miller did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Dawson ordered that the claim be struck out.
The judgment states that the hearing listed for 1 and 2 December 2021 would not take place. No monetary remedy was awarded or assessed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not restate the pleaded cause of action, but the case was listed by GOV.UK under Working Time Regulations and the claim was struck out for non-compliance and failure to actively pursue it. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.