Case 1403653/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Darren Williams v AND 21st Ixer Limited (In Voluntary Creditors’ Liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1403653/2019
- Decision date
- 28 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Darren Williams
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued in chambers after the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. The claimant, Mr Darren Williams, brought a breach of contract claim against 21st Ixer Limited (in voluntary creditors’ liquidation).
The tribunal held that the claimant’s breach of contract claim succeeded in respect of one month’s notice. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £3,750.00.
The judgment does not record any other heads of claim, any separate breakdown of remedy, or any additional findings beyond the notice entitlement and the amount awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the claimant’s breach of contract claim succeeded in respect of one month’s notice and ordered payment of the gross sum of £3,750.00. | Upheld | — | £3,750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,750
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.