Case 1403666/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Thomas v Susan Holmes — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403666/2021
- Decision date
- 14 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the respondent had not entered a response and, under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, entered judgment for the claimant. The judgment awarded £211.60 for unpaid wages and £1,710.53 for unpaid holiday pay.
The decision is a default judgment and does not set out contested findings of fact or a separate reasons section. The amounts awarded are the only substantive remedies recorded in the judgment. No discrimination, dismissal, or other additional heads of claim are identified in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment entered for the claimant after the respondent did not enter a response; sum awarded for unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £212 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment entered for the claimant after the respondent did not enter a response; sum awarded for unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,711 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,922
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.