Case 1403670/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Godfrey v Nicola Blake trading as The Pudding Parlour — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403670/2022
- Decision date
- 17 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Godfrey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 18 November 2022 and the respondent did not present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that Nicola Blake trading as The Pudding Parlour had made unauthorised deductions from Miss S Godfrey’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £741 gross.
The judgment records a total sum payable of £741. No separate breakdown of remedy components was given, and no other claims or findings were recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment under rule 21 found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £741 gross. It also stated that the respondent must pay the claimant £741 in total. | Upheld | — | £741 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £741
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.